whitepaper icon

Coping with Zero Percent Treasury

2 min read

Executive Summary

Investment Considerations:

  • Government Sponsored Enterprises
  • Government Money Market Funds
  • FDIC TLGP Guaranteed Debt
  • Foreign Government Guaranteed Debt
  • Beware Certain “Industrial” Credits

Institutional cash investors found themselves in a pickle when the market’s desire for safety made treasury securities and treasury money market funds inaccessible. However, when the default option is no longer an option, alternative avenues may help investors mitigate credit and liquidity risks in challenging environments.
Our core strategy involves investments in securities supported, directly or indirectly, by the U.S. and certain foreign governments and steers clear of non-government credits at this time. This is a transitional strategy until we have a better assessment of the stability of global financial systems and the long-term impact of global government stimulus efforts. Even though it involves only government credits, due diligence remains crucial to this strategy.

As Treasuries Hit Negative Yields, What Now?

No one will dispute that 2008 was an extremely challenging year for all, and specifically for corporate cash managers. In past market cycles, credit calamities were often little more than a spectator sport for ultra risk-averse cash investors, but 2008 was an excruciating year as many suffered direct losses in this non-stop, 17-month credit Tsunami. After years of neglect, Treasury securities gained new-found fame with corporate treasurers as institutional investors switched from corporate “prime” money market funds to Treasury funds en masse.
But this change in philosophy created a new, pressing problem. As investors fled commercial paper investments and prime money funds seeking the protection of safe-haven treasury securities, demand overwhelmed supply to the point that short-term Treasury bill rates became negative. This means that, in addition to foregoing interest, investors are giving up part of their investment principal so that their cash can be “parked” in treasuries. This phenomenon has persisted since December 9, 2008 when the Treasury sold $27 billion of its three-month bills at a rate of 0.005%.
Treasury money market funds are now feeling the add-on effect of this new investor ideology. As we’ve previously mentioned, treasury funds are faced with unprecedented challenges of extraordinary fund inflows, dangerously low yield levels, and the risk of principal invasion from fund expenses. As a result, many large fund families have instituted fee rebates, trading limitations, and fund closings in order to prevent the funds from “breaking the dollar” and to minimize costs to fund sponsors who subsidize fund expenses.
DOWNLOAD FULL REPORT

Our research is for personal, non-commercial use only. You may not copy, distribute or modify content contained on this Website without prior written authorization from Capital Advisors Group. By viewing this Website and/or downloading its content, you agree to the Terms of Use.

Please click here for disclosure information: Our research is for personal, non-commercial use only. You may not copy, distribute or modify content contained on this Website without prior written authorization from Capital Advisors Group. By viewing this Website and/or downloading its content, you agree to the Terms of Use & Privacy Policy.

Similar Posts

  • May Mid-Month Market Update

    6 min read6 min readLabor Stability and Firm Inflation Keep the Fed Cautious Labor Market: The April employment report pointed to continued stability in the labor market, with nonfarm payrolls exceeding expectations for the second consecutive month (+115,000 in April following +185,000 in March). This marked the first back-to-back monthly job gains since May 2025 and remains well above the…

  • April Month-End Market Update

    6 min read6 min readFed on Hold, But Tilt Shifts Hawkish as Dissents Rise  At its April 29th meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee held the federal funds target range steady at 3.50%–3.75%. Notably, the decision included four dissents, the most since 1992. Governor Stephen Miran dissented in favor of a 25 basis point rate cut, while Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, and Dallas…

  • April Mid-Month Market Update

    4 min read4 min readMarch Labor Market Data Rebounds Labor market data showed signs of improvement in early April, following February’s weaker-than-expected report:  While the unemployment rate edged lower to 4.3% (4.256% unrounded), the improvement was driven in part by a decline in the labor force participation rate, which fell to its lowest level since 2021 as nearly 400,000 individuals exited…

  • March Month-End Market Update

    5 min read5 min readQ1 2026 Recap Geopolitical tensions drove markets in Q1 2026, with the Iran conflict overshadowing much of the quarter. Early signs of escalation—highlighted by comments from Donald Trump in January—began pushing oil prices higher, though Treasury yields were initially driven by monetary policy expectations, reflecting markets anticipation for one to two rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. …

  • March FOMC Update

    2 min read2 min readFOMC Maintains Target Range, Outlook is Uncertain As widely expected, the Federal Open Market Committee left the federal funds target range unchanged at 3.50%–3.75%. Key takeaways from the meeting are outlined below: Statement Summary of Economic Projections Powell’s Press Conference Market Reaction

  • March Mid-Month Market Update

    3 min read3 min readMarch Madness in Markets The conflict with Iran has now entered its third week and has triggered notable shifts across global markets. Oil prices have spiked, Treasury yields have moved higher, equities have declined, and market expectations for Fed rate cuts have been scaled back. Much of the market’s attention remains focused on the Strait…